Current:Home > InvestCourt orders white nationalists to pay $2M more for Charlottesville Unite the Right violence -Edge Finance Strategies
Court orders white nationalists to pay $2M more for Charlottesville Unite the Right violence
View
Date:2025-04-21 02:38:02
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Four years after violence erupted during the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, a jury ordered white nationalist leaders and organizations to pay a total of more than $26 million in damages to people with physical or emotional injuries from the event.
Most of that money — $24 million — was for punitive damages, but a judge later slashed that amount to $350,000 — to be shared by eight plaintiffs. On Monday, a federal appeals court restored more than $2 million in punitive damages, finding that each of the plaintiffs should receive $350,000, instead of the $43,750 each would have received under the lower court’s ruling.
A three-judge panel of the Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the jury’s award of $2 million in compensatory damages, but found that a state law that imposes the $350,000 cap on punitive damages should be applied per person instead of for all eight plaintiffs, as a lower court judge ruled.
The ruling stems from a federal lawsuit against two dozen white nationalists and organizations that participated in two days of demonstrations in Charlottesville to protest the city’s plan to remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee.
On the second day, after the “Unite the Right” rally had been declared an unlawful assembly, James Alex Fields Jr., a white supremacist from Maumee, Ohio, intentionally drove his car into a crowd of counter-protesters, killing one woman and injuring dozens more. Fields, who was one of the defendants in the civil case, is now serving a life sentence for murder and hate crimes.
The 4th Circuit panel rejected a request from the defendants that the court ask the Supreme Court of Virginia to rule on the question of whether each plaintiff can receive $350,000 in punitive damages, saying in its ruling that it found the state law’s language and history “clear enough to predict how Virginia’s high court would rule.”
“Over two years ago, the jury used its $24 million punitive damages award to send an unmistakable message to the defendants and to the public about the outrageous misconduct that took place in Charlottesville, Virginia. While the law compels us to reduce the award, it’s long past time for that message to be delivered,” Chief Judge Albert Diaz wrote in the 3-0 ruling.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs said they were pleased by the court’s ruling.
“Today’s decision restores over $2 million in punitive damages from the jury’s verdict, which sent a clear message against racist and antisemitic hate and violence,” attorneys Roberta Kaplan, David E. Mills and Gabrielle E. Tenzer said in a statement.
Lawyers for the defendants did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment.
The verdict from the 2021 trial was a rebuke to the white nationalist movement, particularly for the two dozen individuals and organizations accused in a federal lawsuit of orchestrating violence against African Americans, Jewish people and others in a meticulously planned conspiracy.
veryGood! (92)
Related
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Colman Domingo talks 'Rustin' Oscar nod and being an awards style icon: 'Isn't it crazy?'
- Optimism about the U.S. economy sends stocks to a new record
- Tommy Hilfiger takes over the Oyster Bar in Grand Central for a joyous New York-centric fashion show
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Kevin Harlan, Olivia Harlan Dekker make Super Bowl 58 a family affair with historic broadcast feat
- 'Pretty in Pink's' Jon Cryer and Andrew McCarthy ended their famous feud on 'The View'
- Kansas City's Patrick Mahomes is breaking another Super Bowl barrier for Black quarterbacks
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- How murdered Hollywood therapist Amie Harwick testified at her alleged killer's trial
Ranking
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Verizon teases upcoming Beyoncé Super Bowl commercial: What to know
- A stepmother says her husband killed his 5-year-old and hid her body. His lawyers say she’s lying
- Ohio city drops charges against pastor who opened his church to house the homeless
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Judge blocks Omaha’s ban on guns in public places while lawsuit challenging it moves forward
- The Lunar New Year of the Dragon flames colorful festivities across Asian nations and communities
- Virginia lawmakers limit public comment and tell folks taking the mic to ‘make it quick’
Recommendation
'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
An Ohio city settles with a truck driver and a former K-9 officer involved in July attack
Is Caitlin Clark the best player ... ever? Five questions about Iowa's transcendent guard
Teen Mom's Kailyn Lowry Reveals Names of Her Newborn Twins
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
Taylor Swift insists that college student stop tracking her private jet's movements
Girlfriend of Illinois shooting suspect pleads not guilty to obstruction
'Pretty in Pink's' Jon Cryer and Andrew McCarthy ended their famous feud on 'The View'