Current:Home > NewsRussia’s Supreme Court effectively outlaws LGBTQ+ activism in a landmark ruling -Edge Finance Strategies
Russia’s Supreme Court effectively outlaws LGBTQ+ activism in a landmark ruling
View
Date:2025-04-16 22:56:28
TALLINN, Estonia (AP) — Russia’s Supreme Court on Thursday effectively outlawed LGBTQ+ activism, in the most drastic step against advocates of gay, lesbian and transgender rights in the increasingly conservative country.
In a statement announcing a lawsuit filed to the court earlier this month, the Justice Ministry argued that authorities had identified “signs and manifestations of an extremist nature” by an LGBTQ+ “movement” operating in Russia, including “incitement of social and religious discord,” although it offered no details or evidence. In its ruling, the court declared the “movement” to be extremist and banned it in Russia.
The hearing took place behind closed doors and with no defendant. Multiple rights activists have pointed out that the lawsuit targeted the “international civic LGBT movement,” which is not an entity but rather a broad and vague definition that would allow Russian authorities to crack down on any individuals or groups deemed to be part of the “movement.”
“Despite the fact that the Justice Ministry demands to label a nonexistent organization -- ‘the international civic LGBT movement’ -- extremist, in practice it could happen that the Russian authorities, with this court ruling at hand, will enforce it against LGBTQ+ initiatives that work in Russia, considering them a part of this civic movement,” Max Olenichev, a human rights lawyer who works with the Russian LGBTQ+ community, told The Associated Press ahead of the hearing.
Some LGBTQ+ activists have said they sought to become a party to the lawsuit, arguing that it concerns their rights, but were rejected by the court. The Justice Ministry has not responded to a request for comment on the lawsuit.
The Supreme Court ruling is the latest step in a decadelong crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights in Russia begun under President Vladimir Putin, who has put “traditional family values” at the cornerstone of his rule.
In 2013, the Kremlin adopted the first legislation restricting LGBTQ+ rights, known as the “gay propaganda” law, banning any public endorsement of “nontraditional sexual relations” among minors. In 2020, constitutional reforms pushed through by Putin to extend his rule by two more terms also included a provision to outlaw same-sex marriage.
After sending troops into Ukraine in 2022, the Kremlin ramped up its comments about protecting “traditional values” from what it called the West’s “degrading” influence, in what rights advocates saw as an attempt to legitimize the war. That same year, the authorities adopted a law banning propaganda of “nontraditional sexual relations” among adults, also, effectively outlawing any public endorsement of LGBTQ+ people.
Another law passed earlier this year prohibited gender transitioning procedures and gender-affirming care for transgender people. The legislation prohibited any “medical interventions aimed at changing the sex of a person,” as well as changing one’s gender in official documents and public records. It also amended Russia’s Family Code by listing gender change as a reason to annul a marriage and adding those “who had changed gender” to a list of people who can’t become foster or adoptive parents.
“Do we really want to have here, in our country, in Russia, ‘Parent No. 1, No. 2, No. 3’ instead of ‘mom’ and ‘dad?’” Putin said in September 2022. “Do we really want perversions that lead to degradation and extinction to be imposed in our schools from the primary grades?”
Authorities have rejected accusations of discrimination against LGBTQ+ people. Earlier this month, Russian media quoted Andrei Loginov, a deputy justice minister, as saying that “the rights of LGBT people in Russia are protected” legally. Loginov spoke in Geneva, while presenting a report on human rights in Russia to the U.N. Human Rights Council, and argued that “restraining public demonstration of non-traditional sexual relationships or preferences is not a form of censure for them.”
veryGood! (19928)
Related
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- USC’s move to cancel commencement amid protests draws criticism from students, alumni
- Celebrate Draft Day With These Top Picks, From Cool Merch to Home Decor & More Touchdown-Worthy Finds
- Gusts of activity underway by friends and foes of offshore wind energy projects
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Horses break loose in central London, near Buckingham Palace, injuring several people
- Luna County corporal is charged for his role in deadly 2023 crash while responding to a call
- Tony Khan, son of Jaguars owner, shows up to NFL draft with neck brace. Here's why.
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Chris Pine Reveals His Favorite Meme of Himself
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- United Methodists endorse change that could give regions more say on LGBTQ and other issues
- House approves bill to criminalize organ retention without permission
- Trading Trump: Truth Social’s first month of trading has sent investors on a ride
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Kansas man sentenced to 10 years for crash that killed officer, pedestrian and K-9 last February
- My Favorite SKIMS Drops This Month: Strapless Bras That Don't Slip, Bold Swimwear, Soft Loungewear & More
- The hidden costs of unpaid caregiving in America
Recommendation
Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
Adobe's Photoshop upgrade reshapes images
Tony Khan, son of Jaguars owner, shows up to NFL draft with neck brace. Here's why.
Philadelphia Eagles give wide receiver A.J. Brown a record contract extension
Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
Jack Wagoner, attorney who challenged Arkansas’ same-sex marriage ban, dies
Journalists critical of their own companies cause headaches for news organizations
As some universities negotiate with pro-Palestinian protestors, others quickly call the police